Solomonic Analytics
In the analytical section of our platform, we try to add on another layer of interpretation by visualising the data in chart form. We have split this into two main sections.
Claims’ Analytics
Visualise claim volume trends overtime and edit the granularity of your data view. Choose to view claims issued on a yearly, quarterly, monthly or weekly basis. Combined with all the extensive filters available, you can now create and download almost instant trend views at the click of a button.
See claim volume by courts - which court is the busiest? Which court is the most prevalent and popular for specific types of claims? Use the filters to the interrogate the data to extract the information you need.
Analyse the volume of claims by party sector. Pinpoint the sector with the most disputes and the sector with the least. Use the toggle to table function to see the raw data and what lies beyond the chart.
Factual subject matters - Legal subjects - Remedies - Topics
The claim analytics pages for factual subject matters, legal subject matters, remedies and topics are built in the same way as the party sector page. Analyse the trends in claim volume associated with each tag by selecting the relevant option. Use the filters to slice and dice the data to spot trends overtime.
View claim outcomes in all courts, followed by a breakdown of individual courts. See how many claims have reached judgment, were withdrawn, were resolved immediately, had met apparent settlement, and settled. Hover over each chart to see the precise underlying data.
How we determine each outcome is as follows:
Judgment: Judgment filed and handed down.
Withdrawn: Typically transferred to another Court.
Resolved immediately: Where the claim has become inactive, without a defence filed.
Apparent settlement: Where the defence has been acknowledged, but no confirmed Tomlin order can be found on record.
Settled: Where there has been documentation confirming that the claim has settled.
View an overview of trial results by court. You can find how many claims failed, succeeded in part, and succeeded in each court and in all courts.
We determine these trial results by the following:
Failure: Got very little or nothing of what the claimants sought. Failed can also include claims where claimants succeeded in receiving nominal damages.
Succeeded in part: Claimants were successful in some of their remedies; or, only received part of the payments they sought.
Success: Claimants received most or all of what they wanted. Defendants only got nominal relied - at best.
Examine trends in claim length and use our data filters to patterns in claim length for claims with specific conditions. You will find the number of claims categorised by their claim lengths in time intervals - that is how long it has taken for a claim to reach an outcome. Across the top of the page, you will find the mean and median number days - alongside the lower and upper quartile range.
We have calculated these statistical indicators:
Mean: All claims lengths totalled, divided by the number of claims.
Median: The claim length of the middle claim when all claims are arranged in order, by claim length.
Upper Quartile: The claim length at the 75th percentile when all claims are sorted in order by claim length.
Lower Quartile: The claim length at the 25th percentile when all claims are sorted in order by claim length.
Visualise the number of active claims across a specified time period. When paired alongside our claims issued chart, this feature allows you to map trends and patterns in claim activity over time, providing a comprehensive view of how claims evolve. You can adjust the granularity of the data and apply filters to interrogate and explore the data further.
Judgments’ Analytics
See a breakdown of judgment results by court. You will see a chart that breaks down judgments by court. Each bar shows you how many judgments failed, succeeded in part and succeeded.
We determine these as:
Failure: All claim outcomes failed.
Succeeded in part: Some claim outcomes failed and some claim outcomes succeeded.
Succeeded: All claim outcomes succeeded.
You will find the number of judgments split by their hearing lengths - that is, the duration between the start of the hearing and final written judgment. You will also find the mean and median hearing length - alongside the lower and upper quartile.
We have calculated these statistical indicators:
Mean: All claims lengths totalled, divided by the number of claims.
Median: The claim length of the middle claim when all claims are arranged in order, by claim length.
Upper Quartile: The claim length at the 75th percentile when all claims are sorted in order by claim length.
Lower Quartile: The claim length at the 25th percentile when all claims are sorted in order by claim length.
Applications win/loss percentage
Here, you will find the success rate of applications to proceed to Judicial review. This is in regards to whether the applicants achieved their desired outcome.
Failure: The applicants got none or very little of what they wanted.
Succeeded in part: The applicants achieved some, but not all, of their desired outcome.
Succeeded: The applicants got most or all of what they wanted.
See a list of all applications we have on the Solomonic platform, the total number of applications for each application type, when the most recent application was and a breakdown of how many of those succeeded, succeeded in part, failure.
View a list of judgments and their corresponding application(s). Use the filter to sort by application type and see all the relevant judgments.
This chart illustrates the average number of times clear words have been referenced in judgments, broken down by court.
Commercial sense - Disagreeing precedent - Distinguishing precedent
The judgment analytic pages for commercial sense, disagreeing precedent and distinguishing precedent are built in the same way as the clear words analytics page. All these charts are clickable.
This chart illustrates the distribution of pleading points across three categories: Failed, Succeeded in part and Succeeded.
Failed: Refers to failed arguments that resulted in the opposing party retaining the right to argue their point in full, as the objections asserting that their point was not pleaded were unsuccessful.
Partly successful: Captures cases where the argument had a mixed outcome, whereby some aspects of the point were excluded from being argued, whilst others were allowed.
Succeeded: Represents successful arguments that resulted in points being entirely excluded from being argued because they were not included in the original pleadings.
You can identify the trends in outcomes of appealed judgments by court. Whilst we don’t cover the Court of Appeal, we capture this data where it public. This can be generally found at the end of the a trial judgment or in documentation that shares if the permission to appeal has been rejected or approved.
Visualise the volume of appeals across courts and use the filters to spot any trends or patterns.
See the average time to judgment, broken down by court.